The Social Network
Screen Rant ’s Kofi Outlaw ReviewsThe Social internet
Facebook is a social medium colossus that has indisputably alter the world , involve everything from how people apportion their lives , to how people market , promote and sell business , ware and even their own talents . In fact , Facebook is so prevalent in our modern digital age that it even has the world power to change the topography of culture , pop - culture , artistic production , politics , and in rarified casing , even religion .
Given that Facebook is what it is today , I must admit that it ’s pretty surprising that it has take this long for a movie to be made about its origin . And while that movie , The Social internet , is an interesting and visually rich exploration of the event that lead up to arguably the most influential invention of a generation , a lustreless ending and overall feel of pointlessness marker it well short of being the film which defines a generation .
By now the basic account behind the invention of Facebook is pretty well known : In 2003 , Harvard pupil Mark Zuckerberg ( Jesse Eisenberg ) come up with an musical theme : take the entire social experience of Harvard and grow it into a comprehensive internet site in a means that other sites like MySpace and Friendster had never picture . Along with two of his software engineer pals , and his best friend Eduardo Saverin ( Andrew Garfield ) render the startup Das Kapital , Zuckerberg produce " The Facebook , " an early blueprint of what would eventually become the societal networking Juggernaut we recognise today .
Of of course with any rose of an estimate seminal fluid thorns , and Zuckerberg ’s meteorologic upgrade to fame ( and infamy ) comes at the cost of multiple legal skirmishes and shattered personal relationships . Being at the forefront of a trend can be be a lonely experience .
There is a lot aboutThe Social Networkthat is impressive . The motion-picture show was channelize by David Fincher , the man behind some great pieces of movie house such asSe7en , Fight Club , Zodiac , and the Oscar - nominatedCurious Case of Benjamin Button . Fincher fan generally know and love the acclaimed conductor for his three main signature : a perfectionist attitude , impeccable camerawork and his dark yet vividly - colored cinematography . All three of those Fincher signatures can be discover inThe Social web , offering viewers a feast for the centre . The other scenes set in Harvard are by far the most gorgeous , call for the historical university and giving it an restive , dark , rock video sheen . I ’m somewhat sure Harvard has never reckon so cool .
Fincher ( with aid from his screenwriter , Aaron Sorkin ) structure the moving-picture show in way that ’s slightly surprising , yet at the same meter refreshing and clever . Most memoir films are pretty analog in kind ( beginning of the event , up until the thematic flood tide ) , howeverThe Social Networktakes another approach . At first it seems as though we ’re getting the standard beginning - to - closing structure , but around the 20 - 30 minute mark the film suddenly start to jump around in space and time , showing Zuckerberg get up in the thick of various legal battles .
It ’s a bit jarring at first , until Fincher eases us into the realization that it ’s in reality the conversation in these effectual depositions that are drive the story . lawyer postulate questions , and the answer lead to flashback about Facebook ’s inception ; what is revealed in those flashbacks lead to further legal doubt which jump us yet again to one deposition or another , as Zuckerberg tries to defend " his creation " from various attackers . It go more perplexing than it really is ; in the hands of a skilled orchestrator like Fincher , this unique body structure works to the picture ’s welfare , adding a sense of movement to what could ’ve been a boring plastic film , otherwise .
The performances are somewhat spectacular - specially those of the two leads , Eisenberg and Garfield . Eisenberg has been tagged in some circles as " the other Michael Cera , " denote to the latter actor ’s preference for playing the loveable grind in most every part he takes on . This is not at all true for Eisenberg , who portray Mark Zuckerberg as something of a tragically ironical public figure : an acerbic genius who is whole clueless when it comes to human interaction ; a guy who earns fortune and celebrity off a website give to social circling , but has very few " tangible friends " to call his own .
David Fincher’s The Social Network chronicles the birth of Facebook and the rise of tech mogul Mark Zuckerberg. Following Zuckerberg (Jesse Eisenberg) as he creates his famous social network along with his friend and investor Eduardo Saverin (Andrew Garfield). As Facebook’s popularity grows, Zuckerberg faces legal action from former friends, with The Social Network following his journey from an innovative young student to a titan of industry.
Eisenberg bland - out steals just about every scene he ’s in , glaring at people around him like they are dimwit , while delivering vituperative insights that could make a soul feel that very mode . A definite standout carrying into action that is worthy of recognition ( provided people do n’t find his type too unlikable ) .
Andrew Garfield is a fast - rising star : he ’s already been tap as the newSpider - Manin Sony ’s reboot of that enfranchisement , and he has another prestigiousness picture , Never Let Me Go , due out this crepuscule . Here , Garfield plays a near - perfect straight adult male foil to Eisenberg ’s eccentric genius . Eduardo Saverin is the type of bright tike who ( ironically enough ) prefers the factual social experience of college to sit in dim - lit dorm rooms make an on-line imitation of it . Garfield successfully builds Saverin into a three - dimensional character with a kitchen range of a emotion , a slightly naive kid get up in a gold rush that is moving right smart too fast for him ( or anyone ) to keep forwards of .
The scenes of Saverin and Zuckerberg in their well-chosen sidereal day at Harvard juxtapose well to the late days when they ’re ultimately sitting across the tabular array from one another , talking through lawyers . The climatic fit of their falling out actually load down some worked up punch , which is a course credit that croak directly to the talents of both young men .
Of naturally , I ’d be remiss if I did n’t name Justin Timberlake as Sean Parker , the inventor of Napster who eventually partner with Zuckerberg to transform Facebook into the giant it is today . Timberlake handle to shed his renown double and slide into his role pretty well , depict Parker as an super savvy man of affairs who is at the same time chock full of B.S .. All in all , Timberlake continues to leaven that he is not the joke of an worker some people may want to judge him as .
keep to the disappointing aspects ofThe Social connection …
I ’ve discuss what impressed me aboutThe Social internet , now I must address what disappointed me . That would be the script by Aaron Sorkin . Let me be clear : Sorkin ’s script displume out of the gate crepitation with DOE , good tempo and lash - voguish dialogue . This a film with almost no physical action , and so the conversation between characters had to be completely engaging and amusing forThe Social Networkto have any traction at all . Sorkin rises to that challenge .
The job ( for me at least ) is that the movie starts with a bash but cease with a fizzle . The opening scene ( a conversation between Zuckerberg and his ex - girlfriend , played by Rooney Mara ) is one of the best I ’ve determine since Quentin Tarantino’sInglorious Basterds , and impregnate authority early on that " the Facebook moving picture " might be more dynamic and entertaining than ask . As I ’ve pronounce , the dialogue is sharp , crisp , rosehip and thoroughly entertaining , however it ’s the presence of a big gunpoint to the floor that seems to be miss fromThe Social connection .
Sure , the moving-picture show has a full stop - only it ’s one that becomes all too obvious far too too soon , and is hammered on again and again throughout the film ’s final enactment , just in face anyone in the hearing is too dim to get it . The theme of Sorkin ’s script are also jolly ready-made : legal battles and lose friends are much rites of passage in the hike to fame and fortune in America - we ’ve picture this storey many time before . By the clip the big fallout between Zuckerberg and Saverin plays out , despite how well it ’s executed , I was left palpate somewhat underwhelmed .
To be honest , I believe Sorkin invest one of the keen sin of storytelling : missing the opportunity to both appear deeply and say something vainglorious . Part of what makesThe Social web ’s first third so piquant is that we get to see Zuckerberg in reality interact in the digital realm he is about to overturn . We hear entries from hisLive Journalblog in voiceover , see him creating other , smaller , web projects and determine him squirming between a digital realm where he ’s a virtual god , and the real earth where he ’s a pathetic loser . For me , this opening act was the most interesting thing the film offered - a larger comment about how we all navigate life and " reality " in a digital age where our on-line profiles , blog and Tweets have begun to define us more than our flesh and blood actions can .
However , by the time the movie hits its centre , Sorkin ’s script loses a good deal of steam , settling into a stock narrative of riches , renown , power , and the family relationship fractured as a upshot . The script also oddly deviate its focal point away from Zuckerberg and onto some of the secondary case such as Saverin , Parker , or ( oddly enough ) a trinity of Harvard students who also sue Zuckerberg over Facebook . Combined , the jumping between characters , time and station quickly wear upon the film ’s unequaled structure thinly , and worse , made me pop out to wonder what the point was .
There ’s also one glaring trouble with telling this fib at all : the story of Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook is still being written . How can Sorkin forge a story that feel ended when the person the story is about has not yet completed his archway ? If Facebook ’s role in our lives is still germinate , what point is there to be made about its instauration - that it be Zuckerberg friends and gave him effectual headache ? As I say , that ’s a ready-made level , but more to the point : most people would argue that becoming a multi - billionaire in your 20 is worth it . For those citizenry - who think the reward rationalise the struggle -The Social Networkis going to have petty insight to extend .
It ’s only in the close down minute of the film that Sorkin ’s script returns to the intriguing theme offered by the possible action bit : how Zuckerberg ’s on-line persona coincide with his existent - world experience . I consider Sorkin and Fincher felt they were being abstruse and profound by fold things off that way ; in my opinion , The Social Networkmight’ve sincerely been ' the film that defined a multiplication ' had that doubt been explored at greater duration . As it stand , this is pretty much the story about how a couple of Harvard kids dumbfound rich off of the Internet .
see the drone forThe Social Networkto help you decide whether to see it in theater :
[ poll id=“78 " ]
